Is there any credible proof that Evolution (‘Modern Synthesis’) is true?

Q. Is there any credible proof that Darwin/Modern Synthesis is true?

Asked by John Joy via Facebook

Personally, I think it’s more reasonable to flip this question on its head, and ask ‘Is there any credible proof that Darwin/Modern Synthesis is false?’

(By ‘Darwin’, incidentally, I’m assuming that we’re talking about Darwin’s theory of natural selection – the process underpinning evolution. The Modern Synthesis is essentially our current interpretation of Darwinian evolution, and is built on various branches of biology to give a ‘big picture’ view.)

Our current understanding of evolution (which I talk about in this blog post) is a neat example of the scientific method in action – that is, scientists have developed a hypothesis (in this case, how organisms evolve) and have tested that hypothesis by gathering information and seeing whether the hypothesis withstands scrutiny when viewed through the prism of the information that’s been gathered. In my view (and the view of many others), evolution does withstand that scrutiny: all the evidence available to us is consistent with organisms evolving as a result of natural selection.

At one time, much of our understanding of evolution stemmed from the fossil record – a sequence of fossils that represent a ‘snapshot’ of what organisms looked like at various points in time. This record is a stunning representation of how organisms have evolved over tens of thousands of years – though it’s not perfect. Yes, there are gaps in this record. But, then, the fossil record isn’t the only evidence on which our understanding of evolution is based. For example, we now have the benefit of molecular data, which help us to characterise how the genes of organisms have changed: not only can we ‘see’ how organisms have evolved by looking at their physical form in the fossil record, but we can also see how their genes have changed. And, because physical form is determined by our genes – such that if genes change, physical form changes – we find the available evidence consistent. Whatever way we look at the information, it relays the same message: our current understanding of evolution is indeed credible.

Article by Jon Crowe

November 13, 2012

Jon Crowe is a science publisher (by day) and science writer (at various other times). A biochemistry graduate (University of Warwick, 1997), he was a runner-up in the 2001 Daily Telegraph/BASF Young Science Writer Competition (back when he was still classed as being young). Jon has co-authored two editions of Chemistry for the Biosciences, which first published in 2006, and is currently embroiled in writing the third. He lives with his fiancee, Katy, and their slightly rotund cat, Basil, in Eynsham, Oxfordshire (the location of one of the two toll bridges across the River Thames). They mostly enjoy drinking tea and eating cake. You can follow him on Twitter @crowe_jon

Back To Top

2 thoughts on “Is there any credible proof that Evolution (‘Modern Synthesis’) is true?”

  1. If this person really, truly wanted to know the answer to his own question, then it would have been so easy to find it. I’m highly wary of this kind of people, so it’s admirable that you give this person the benefit of doubt.

    1. Thanks, Kay. Well, I thought more than anything that it was a good opportunity to highlight that science isn’t just a collection of different assertions and facts. Science is an approach to critically probing and questioning the world around us.

      Much of science is ‘fact’ because the available evidence overwhelmingly supports those facts – but (to my mind) the exciting thing is that science also evolves over time as we find out new things that enable us to draw new, more refined views of the living world. Science is a powerful tool, to be sure!

Leave Your Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *